The Westcountry
Rivers Trust is an environmental charity (Charity
No: 1045806) established in 1995 to secure the preservation,
protection, development and improvement of the rivers,
streams, watercourses and water impoundments in
the Westcountry and to advance the education of
the public in the management of water.
A cornerstone
of our philosophy is working in partnership with
external individuals and organisations to share
expertise and facilitate better information transfer.
By collaborating with a whole range of stakeholders
- ranging from individual businesses through to
academic institutions, NGOs and government departments
- the Trust aims to circumvent sectoral interests
and encourages joint solutions to the complex environmental
problems our society currently faces.
The Trust operates
the Ecosystem Approach, which was designed by the
IUCN. This approach allows us to implement environmental
change at the appropriate level and means that rather
than forcing our will on individuals and communities,
we empower them to taken ownership, and thus responsibility
for the work, thus creating sustainable change.
The principles of the Ecosystem
Approach are:
1.
Management objectives are a matter of social choice
2. Ecosystems must
be managed in a human context
3. Ecosystems must
be managed within natural limits
4. Management must
recognise that change is inevitable
5. Ecosystem management
must be undertaken at the appropriate level
6. Ecosystem management
must seek to maintain or enhance ecosystem character
and functioning at an appropriate level for social
choice
7. Decision-makers
should be guided by appropriate tools from science
8. Ecosystem manager
should act with caution
9. A multi-disciplinary
approach is needed
10. Ecosystem managers
need to think globally but act locally
An example of using the Ecosystem Approach
to deal with conservation issues is shown below:
Imagine a river
which rises in a rural catchment, which has been
farmed for centuries. The river flows through pasture,
then woods, then through a conurbation until it
reaches a city where it widens substantially. Eventually
it flows through the city and back in the countryside,
before exiting into the sea at a popular tourist
spot.
The
above scenario could give rise to a number of issues:
1. Intensification
of farming leading to increased nutrient leaching,
making water abstracted for human consumption expensive
to treat, increasing costs of water companies treatment
works, resulting in higher water bills.
2. Increased stock
numbers leading to greater poaching of ground and
increased sedimentation. This reduces fish spawning
habitat, resulting in less fish. As fishing deteriorates,
so does capital value of river/fishery resulting
in less investment. Less investment results in less
care and attention for the river, and less interest
in its well being….this is a vicious circle.
3. Sedimentation
eventually arrives in estuary where it blocks shipping
channels. This has to be dredged, which is expensive
and very damaging to the environment, and is usually
then dumped at sea…destroying a pristine marine
environment.
4. Chemicals from
headwaters flow through city, into coastal catchment
where people swim and surf. They suffer from effects
of bacteria etc in the water and tourism reduces.
This has a knock on effect on the local economy.
5. Wetland being
drained for farming means that water rushes through
the river faster, as there is no stabilising effect
and gradual release any longer. This leads to flooding
in the city costing millions of pounds in insurance
and requiring flood defence works.
 |
|
All of this is
a problem because the headwaters of the river have
been abused. Farmers farm intensively because the
Common Agricultural Policy tells them to. Their
brief is to produce lots of food, very cheaply and
this they do very well. However if the system could
be fractionally altered, this could have a massive
benefit for the rivers. This is where the Ecosystem
Approach comes into play.
1. Modulate
the Common Agricultural Payments to protect wildlife zones and rivers,
rather than require intensive production
2. Create buffer
zones along rivers for wildlife, grasses and trees
3. Re-flood wetlands
to create bird friendly zones and water carrying
capacity
These 3 simple
actions, taken at the appropriate level result in
the removal of all the issues listed above. They
may not repair the damage done, although they will
certainly help, but they will prevent further damage.
They will result in an improved and protected environment,
reduced flooding, reduced dredging, increased wildlife
and biodiversity, improved summer and winter flows,
improved fisheries and economic enhancement of river
and a nicer landscape with more varied crops and
cover.
Imagine the costs
of the problems, and look at the savings generated
by the solution…it is a win/win situation
with no-one losing out….food for thought.
|